…By Henry George for TDPel Media.
The defense team argues that the accused, Louis De Zoysa, who claims he did not intend to shoot Sgt Matt Ratana, should be partially held responsible due to diminished responsibility caused by an “autistic meltdown.”
Before the jury retired, Imran Khan KC, the defense lawyer, implored them to view the evidence through De Zoysa’s perspective, emphasizing the need to consider his state of mind during the incident.
According to the defense, De Zoysa’s behavior can only be explained as a result of a meltdown.
The defense lawyer urged the jury not to rush their decision, emphasizing the need for careful consideration.
The verdict will ultimately determine De Zoysa’s culpability in the tragic killing of Sgt Matt Ratana.